Skip to content

Optimising Quantifier Evaluation #21

Description

@DavePearce

(see also #20)

The implementation of quantifiers looks something like this:

static private boolean block$217(BigInteger[] xs) {
  for(BigInteger k = BigInteger.valueOf(0L);0 < k.compareTo(BigInteger.valueOf(xs.length));k = k.add(BigInteger.ONE)) {
    if(...)  { return true; }
    }
  return false;
}

This is pretty horrendously inefficient. Realistically, we want k to have Java type int, since this is the optimal solution. However, the problem is that we then need to maintain an environment of some kind which allows us to know that k has type int when translating xs[k] above to avoid it becoming xs[k.intValue()].

NOTE: this might be partially fixed with the introduction of fixed-size integers. In such case, presumably k would have type uint anyway.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions