Weird sentence in comments in src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs

[steffahn]

rust/src/test/ui/pattern/bindings-after-at/nested-type-ascription-syntactically-invalid.rs

Lines 1 to 2 in 998cfe5

	// Here we check that type ascription is syntactically invalid when
	// not in the top position of a ascribing a let binding or function parameter.

In the sentence above, I’m unable to figure out the grammatical role of the word “ascribing” and the two “a”s.

I’m not immediately sure how to best fix it without changing the meaning so something that isn’t meant.

---

Found while doing #88230

@rustbot label T-compiler

[pierwill]

@rustbot claim