Skip to content

Signed::is_positive and Signed::is_negative implementation/documentation is inconsistent #417

Description

@Zeenobit

Based on the documentation:

/// Returns true if the number is positive and false if the number is zero or negative.
fn is_positive(&self) -> bool;

/// Returns true if the number is negative and false if the number is zero or positive.
fn is_negative(&self) -> bool;

However, for signed integer types, we have the following, which matches the documentation:

#[inline]
fn is_positive(&self) -> bool { *self > 0 }

#[inline]
fn is_negative(&self) -> bool { *self < 0 }

But then for floating point types we have:

/// Returns `true` if the number is positive, including `+0.0` and `INFINITY`
#[inline]
fn is_positive(&self) -> bool {
    FloatCore::is_sign_positive(*self)
}

/// Returns `true` if the number is negative, including `-0.0` and `NEG_INFINITY`
#[inline]
fn is_negative(&self) -> bool {
    FloatCore::is_sign_negative(*self)
}

And so with a simple test like this:

dbg!(Signed::is_positive(&0i32));
dbg!(Signed::is_positive(&0.0f32));

We get:

Signed::is_positive(&0i32) = false
Signed::is_positive(&0.0f32) = true

I'm not sure what the best approach here (i.e. should 0 count as positive or not for floating point).

But the behavior should be consistent between floats and ints, and match the documentation on the Signed trait.
Otherwise it leads to really subtle and dangerous arithmetic errors.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions