Skip to content

docs: establish product and technical gap baseline - #942

Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 16 commits into
mainfrom
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline-20260820
Draft

seonghobae wants to merge 16 commits into
mainfrom
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline-20260820

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Purpose

Establish the evidence-based completion authority for pg-erd-cloud: current implementation and PR evidence, buyer-visible product/technical gaps, the initial truthful GA profile, architecture and ecosystem ownership, exact-head delivery rules, release gates, Figma/Storybook authority, and APA 7 research/standards traceability.

This PR is documentation-only. It does not enable multi-tenant SaaS, persistent live DDL apply, or any new runtime behavior.

Current evidence

What changed

docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

  • Defines the standalone product and CWL authority boundaries.
  • Selects single_tenant_managed as the first defensible GA target.
  • Keeps multi_tenant_saas non-GA until database-enforced tenant isolation and lifecycle evidence exist.
  • Keeps persistent forward-engineering apply default-deny/non-GA until the complete approval, execution, convergence, and recovery path is proven.
  • Adds a completion definition spanning buyer journey, data integrity, security, coverage/docstrings, operability, UX/design, supply chain, commercial claims, and ecosystem contracts.
  • Maps current gaps to executable Issues and existing PR dependencies.
  • Retains the full live 61-PR inventory as dated triage evidence and defines the exact-head verification loop and release gate.

ARCHITECTURE.md

  • Defines product, identity, document, LLM, PIM, and central-governance authorities.
  • Adds deployment profiles, runtime/data/security decisions, forward-engineering maturity, design authority, operability/performance, ecosystem contracts, and release authority.
  • Preserves independent deployment and module/connector boundaries.

ADR-0002

Research/standards doctoring

  • Adds requirement → buyer problem → product decision → owning work traceability.
  • Includes APA 7 references for ER/relational modeling, normalization, temporal data, provenance, architecture description, secrets/key management, zero trust/SCIM/continuous access, GenAI risk, WCAG, fuzzing, PostgreSQL partitioning, SSDF, and SLSA.
  • Explicitly separates standards alignment from certification and citations from implementation proof.

Canonical completion Issues created

Design authority

  • Figma File ID: csnpEEJfmqFWB0vNUoTkWA
  • Supplemental Figma File ID: OTN0rBGtnVy0P7yq4Iv9Si

Figma is the reviewed visual source of intent. Shared design tokens, Storybook stories, accessibility/component tests, browser interaction tests, and production code are the executable contract. Screenshots are QA evidence only.

Verification and current status

  • Repository content was re-read against protected main, existing implementation, open Issues/PRs, and exact-head GitHub evidence.
  • CodeRabbit status on current head: success.
  • Current-head GitHub Actions at the latest refresh:
    • ci: queued
    • SAST Semgrep: queued
    • Security Scan: queued
  • No formal review submission or unresolved review thread was present at the previous refresh; this must be refetched before merge.

Queued checks are not treated as success. This PR must merge only through normal protected-branch semantics after fresh exact-head checks and qualifying review evidence.


Open in Devin Review

@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 09:35
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 35 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f923dd43-62fe-4d8f-8ec1-a8d99eddd444

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8dc7469 and c5c0fd4.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md
  • docs/adr/README.md
  • docs/doctoring/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review\n\nUse exact current head 7fb0061. Submit one formal GitHub review after required checks complete; approve only if the current head is green and no actionable finding remains. Do not mutate or merge.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review

Use exact current head 3585bd2. Submit one formal GitHub review after required checks complete; approve only if green and no actionable finding remains. Do not mutate or merge.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review

Use exact current head aa156cc. Submit one formal GitHub review after required checks complete; approve only if green and no actionable finding remains. Do not mutate or merge.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review

Use exact current head 1bf0517. Submit one formal GitHub review after required checks complete; approve only if green and no actionable finding remains. Do not mutate or merge.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review\n\nUse exact current head d0d7be3. Submit one formal GitHub review after required checks complete; approve only if green and no actionable finding remains. Do not mutate or merge.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Current-head review request for d0d7be3. Review the baseline and ADR against current repository boundaries, Figma identifiers, and the documented research citations. Report only actionable findings for this exact head.

@opencode-agent @coderabbitai

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review current head d0d7be3

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

requested_head="d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241"
repo="ContextualWisdomLab/pg-erd-cloud"
pr="942"

echo "== Pull request metadata =="
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json number,url,headRefName,headRefOid,baseRefName,state,isDraft,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{number,url,headRefName,headRefOid,baseRefName,state,isDraft,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | {name,status,conclusion,detailsUrl}]}'

echo
echo "== Requested commit availability and checkout HEAD =="
git rev-parse HEAD
git cat-file -e "${requested_head}^{commit}"
git show -s --format='commit=%H%nparents=%P%nsubject=%s' "$requested_head"

echo
echo "== Changed files at requested commit relative to first parent =="
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r "$requested_head"

echo
echo "== ADR and baseline documentation candidates =="
fd -t f . docs 2>/dev/null | sort | rg '(^|/)(0002-product-technical-gap-baseline|.*gap.*baseline|.*ADR.*|.*adr.*)\.(md|mdx)$' || true

echo
echo "== Outline of primary ADR =="
ast-grep outline docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md --items all --view expanded 2>/dev/null || true

echo
echo "== Primary ADR with line numbers =="
cat -n docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md

echo
echo "== Repository-boundary configuration and manifests =="
fd -t f -a 'package.json' -o -a 'pnpm-workspace.yaml' -o -a 'turbo.json' -o -a 'nx.json' -o -a 'docker-compose*.yml' -o -a 'docker-compose*.yaml' -o -a 'README.md' . \
  -E node_modules -E .git | sort

echo
echo "== Figma and citation references in changed documentation =="
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r "$requested_head" \
  | rg '\.(md|mdx|txt)$' \
  | while IFS= read -r file; do
      echo "--- $file"
      rg -n -i -C2 '(figma|https?://|doi:|references|bibliography|apa)' "$file" || true
    done

Length of output: 9820


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

requested_head="d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241"
base="$(git merge-base origin/main "$requested_head" 2>/dev/null || git rev-parse "${requested_head}^")"

echo "== Full PR changed files from merge base =="
git diff --name-status "$base" "$requested_head"

echo
echo "== Documentation diff =="
git diff --unified=40 "$base" "$requested_head" -- \
  'docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md' \
  'docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md' \
  'docs/doctoring/product-technical-gap-baseline.md' \
  'CLAUDE.md'

echo
echo "== Current maintainer guidance =="
cat -n CLAUDE.md

echo
echo "== Repository manifests and root documentation =="
fd -t f -a . . -E .git -E node_modules \
  | rg '(^|/)(package\.json|pnpm-workspace\.yaml|turbo\.json|nx\.json|docker-compose[^/]*\.ya?ml|README\.md)$' \
  | sort

echo
echo "== Workspace and package identifiers =="
fd -t f -a 'package.json' . -E .git -E node_modules \
  | sort \
  | while IFS= read -r file; do
      echo "--- $file"
      jq -r '{name,private,workspaces,scripts:(.scripts // {} | keys)}' "$file"
    done

echo
echo "== Boundary-system references in documentation and source configuration =="
rg -n -i -C2 '(clearfolio|naruon|contextual-orchestrator|connector|integration|ecosystem|monorepo|workspace)' \
  docs CLAUDE.md README.md .github 2>/dev/null || true

echo
echo "== All Figma references and identifier contexts =="
rg -n -i -C3 '(figma\.com|figma|csnpEEJfmqFWB0vNUoTkWA|OTN0rBGtnVy0P7yq4Iv9Si)' \
  docs CLAUDE.md README.md .github 2>/dev/null || true

echo
echo "== Citation text and DOI resolution headers =="
rg -n -i -C2 '(Chen, P\. P\.-S\.|Codd, E\. F\.|National Institute of Standards|doi\.org/)' docs
for doi in \
  '10.1145/320434.320440' \
  '10.1145/362384.362685' \
  '10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218'
do
  printf '\n--- https://doi.org/%s\n' "$doi"
  curl -sSIL --max-time 20 -o /dev/null -w 'http=%{http_code} effective_url=%{url_effective}\n' "https://doi.org/$doi" || true
done

echo
echo "== Whitespace errors at requested head =="
git diff --check "$base" "$requested_head"

Length of output: 70762


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="ContextualWisdomLab/pg-erd-cloud"

echo "== PR `#824` Figma references =="
gh pr diff 824 --repo "$repo" --color=never \
  | rg -n -i -C4 '(figma|csnpEEJfmqFWB0vNUoTkWA|OTN0rBGtnVy0P7yq4Iv9Si|29:143)' || true

echo
echo "== PR `#824` current metadata =="
gh pr view 824 --repo "$repo" --json number,state,isDraft,headRefOid,title,url \
  --jq '{number,state,isDraft,headRefOid,title,url}'

echo
echo "== Crossref metadata for DOI references =="
for doi in \
  '10.1145/320434.320440' \
  '10.1145/362384.362685' \
  '10.1109/TSE.2019.2946569'
do
  echo "--- $doi"
  curl -fsSL --max-time 20 "https://api.crossref.org/works/$doi" \
    | jq '{title:.message.title[0],type:.message.type,author:(.message.author | map(.family + ", " + (.given // ""))),published_print:.message["published-print"]["date-parts"][0],published_online:.message["published-online"]["date-parts"][0],volume:.message.volume,issue:.message.issue,page:.message.page,container:.message["container-title"][0]}'
done

echo
echo "== W3C and NIST citation target headers =="
for url in \
  'https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/' \
  'https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218'
do
  echo "--- $url"
  curl -sSIL --max-time 20 -o /dev/null -w 'http=%{http_code} effective_url=%{url_effective}\n' "$url" || true
done

Length of output: 58118


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="ContextualWisdomLab/pg-erd-cloud"
head="d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241"
doi="https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2946569"

echo "== OpenAlex metadata for the Manes et al. DOI =="
curl -fsSL --max-time 20 \
  --get 'https://api.openalex.org/works' \
  --data-urlencode "filter=doi:${doi}" \
  | jq '.results[0] | {
    title,
    publication_year,
    publication_date,
    type,
    primary_location:{
      source:.primary_location.source.display_name,
      landing_page_url:.primary_location.landing_page_url
    },
    biblio,
    authorships:[.authorships[] | .author.display_name]
  }'

echo
echo "== Current exact-head check runs =="
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.check_runs | map({name,status,conclusion,details_url})'

echo
echo "== Current pull request head and merge state =="
gh pr view 942 --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{headRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | select(.name != null) | {name,status,conclusion}]}'

Length of output: 1503


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

repo="ContextualWisdomLab/pg-erd-cloud"
head="d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241"

echo "== Scholarly metadata lookup responses =="
for url in \
  'https://api.openalex.org/works/https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2946569' \
  'https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/DOI:10.1109/TSE.2019.2946569?fields=title,year,publicationDate,journal,venue,authors,externalIds'
do
  echo "--- $url"
  curl -sSL --max-time 20 "$url" \
    | jq '{
      title:(.title // .message.title[0] // null),
      year:(.publication_year // .year // null),
      publication_date:(.publication_date // .publicationDate // null),
      journal:(.primary_location.source.display_name // .journal.name // .venue // null),
      volume:(.biblio.volume // .journal.volume // null),
      issue:(.biblio.issue // .journal.pages // null),
      pages:(.biblio.first_page + "-" + .biblio.last_page // .journal.pages // null),
      doi:(.doi // .externalIds.DOI // null),
      api_error:(.error // .message // null)
    }' || true
done

echo
echo "== Current exact-head check runs =="
gh api "repos/$repo/commits/$head/check-runs?per_page=100" \
  --jq '.check_runs | map({name,status,conclusion,details_url})'

echo
echo "== Current PR head and merge state =="
gh pr view 942 --repo "$repo" --json headRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup \
  --jq '{headRefOid,mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | select(.name != null) | {name,status,conclusion}]}'

Length of output: 7436


@seonghobae I found two actionable documentation findings on exact head d0d7be3a1e1194e1d03d51df0e680fcf0cec5241.

  1. Clarify the supplemental Figma file authority.
    docs/adr/0002-product-technical-gap-baseline.md, Lines 12-17, records both file IDs as visual design authority. PR #824 identifies csnpEEJfmqFWB0vNUoTkWA as the authoritative screen file. It identifies OTN0rBGtnVy0P7yq4Iv9Si as a token reference and explicitly rejects it as screen authority. State this distinction in the ADR and in docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md Lines 51-55. Otherwise, a reviewer can use the conflicting supplemental file as the visual source.

  2. Correct the Manès et al. APA 7 publication year.
    docs/doctoring/product-technical-gap-baseline.md, Line 25, cites the final IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering volume 47, issue 11, pages 2312–2331, but uses 2019. The DOI reflects online-first publication. The cited final issue is from 2021. Use Manès et al. (2021) for the volume-and-issue reference.

I did not approve. The exact head is verified, but required checks are still queued and the PR is BEHIND main.

You are interacting with an AI system.

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 12:05
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@opencode-agent review current head 62ba4cc after the normal base update. Revalidate exact-head documentation/CI behavior and all current checks.

@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 12:11
@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Queued @opencode-agent for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Already queued @opencode-agent on this exact request for PR #942 at head 153451e35cb5fc10ba71ec8d9dc7fb14ada1c1ce. Central exact-name Actions artifacts are the durable dispatch ledger; existing review workflows remain authoritative for the final verdict and failure evidence.

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 18:16
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 18:37
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Exact-head documentation update for ab8b190.

Refreshed the living gap baseline from the live REST PR inventory on 2026-08-21 (62 open PRs, including #954 and current exact heads) and added the ADR index required by the repository documentation contract. The baseline continues to distinguish observed evidence from inferred claims and records the Figma file IDs, single-tenant GA boundary, ecosystem ownership, research/standards traceability, and release gates.

Local proof:

  • CodeGraph sync completed
  • git diff --check passed
  • documentation-only change; no runtime test suite is applicable
  • no approval, dismissal, admin merge, force-push, or protection bypass command

Please review this exact HEAD and run the required current-head checks. @opencode-agent

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

Open in Devin Review

Comment thread docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md Outdated
@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 20, 2026 21:52
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Current HEAD 검증: c5c0fd4

  • 문서 내부의 P0 release-candidate 항목을 62 open PRs로 정정하여 헤더·inventory·table과 일치시킴
  • docs-only 변경이며 git diff --check 및 CodeGraph sync 통과

이 코멘트는 위 exact HEAD의 검증 증거입니다. GitHub required checks와 독립 승인 후 일반 merge를 진행합니다.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Exact-head documentation validation for c5c0fd4

  • Rechecked the live source: the P0 release row now says 62 open PRs, matching the inventory evidence and the corrected review thread is resolved as outdated.
  • ADR-0002 records the primary Figma File ID csnpEEJfmqFWB0vNUoTkWA and supplemental File ID OTN0rBGtnVy0P7yq4Iv9Si; Storybook and APA 7 traceability are present.
  • git diff check passed. Current CI, Security Scan, and SAST runs remain queued; no independent approval is present. No approval, dismissal, admin merge, bypass, or force-push was used.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

현재 HEAD c5c0fd4459d290b46c9eeac64741a6ce70e3f430 기준으로 문서 baseline, ADR-0002, Figma File ID, Storybook/제품 gap 및 APA 7 doctoring 기록을 확인했습니다. unresolved review thread는 0개입니다.

GitHub exact-head 결과: ci, SAST Semgrep, Security Scan, CodeRabbit, Devin Review 모두 success. 다만 qualifying independent approval이 없어 보호 규칙상 병합하지 않고 다음 PR로 진행합니다.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot added priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks type: docs Documentation, ADR, PRD, or technical writing labels Aug 22, 2026
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2026
- #949: replace the placeholder with the issue's seven-part bounded
  decomposition (plan authority, sandbox runtime, live preflight provider,
  approval/authorization, apply worker, convergence/recovery, ops/evidence)
  and the mandatory safety invariants.
- #952: replace the placeholder with the three governed vertical workflows
  (reference-document attachment, grounded reversing spec, naruon
  projection) and the product boundary. Reconcile the contextual-
  orchestrator wording with the existing configuration-only
  /chat/completions integration in docs/llm-orchestrator-integration.md
  (CodeRabbit finding) — remaining work is governance (credential
  boundary, tenant context, discovery/routing/fallback delegation), not a
  missing transport.
- #953: replace the placeholder with the release-integration scope
  (PR-queue shaping, dependency backlog with per-item decisions, required
  release evidence) and list #1040/#1024/#1025 as its increments.
- #951: add #1041 (baseline harness) to the increment PRs; update the
  remaining increments.
- Fix the stacked-PR count/list mismatch (Devin + CodeRabbit finding):
  11 increment PRs + this document, with #942 called out separately.
- Add a References (APA 7th) section (Devin "research grounding absent"
  finding): AERA/APA/NCME 2014, Codd 1971, NIST SP 800-218, SLSA v1.2,
  PostgreSQL 18 DDL.

Docs-only; tests/test_docstrings.py green. Still blocked from merge by
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#1531.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013SeQS8tSee5QVeyGpJ9SaY
@seonghobae seonghobae added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 2, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Admission-state correction for exact head c5c0fd4459d290b46c9eeac64741a6ce70e3f430.

protected main 대비 16 ahead / 0 behind, three visible workflows successful, unresolved thread 0입니다. 그러나 current-head independent APPROVED review가 없습니다.

This PR is being moved from Ready to Draft/Proposed. It remains open and its commits, reviews, threads, and valid delta are preserved. Return it to Ready only after the causal blocker is repaired and the unchanged/reconciled exact head has fresh terminal Checks, zero substantive unresolved findings, and any required current-head independent approval. No bypass, synthetic status, manual rerun, force push, review dismissal, or Close is used.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as draft September 19, 2026 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks type: docs Documentation, ADR, PRD, or technical writing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant