Skip to content

merge queue: checking #519 on main (344657b) - #585

Closed
mergify[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/6d4cdcd9b0
Closed

mergify[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
mergify/merge-queue/6d4cdcd9b0

Conversation

@mergify

@mergify mergify Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

#519 is queued for merge on branch main (344657b).

This pull request has been created by Mergify to check the mergeability of #519.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule admin-bypass for merge:

  • check-success = lint
  • check-success = test
  • check-success = validate

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
checking_base_sha: 344657b861ff4711e6bbc1a1cc5670bd74f97fb9
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 519
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

EdbertChan and others added 3 commits September 13, 2026 20:58
…rely agree

The session behind slice (1) ran one command against one container image and
proved that image had no corepack. That was written up as corepack having been
removed from Node 25+, a version-boundary claim no command in the session ever
checked. The output was true and the sentence was wider than the output.

prove-it already covers a missing check and a hedge. It did not cover a check
that ran, came back narrower than the claim, and got filed under the wider
heading anyway -- which is the common case, because the cheap check is always
the reachable instance.

It binds hardest in a correction: restating the original overclaim while
pasting a narrower proof relabels the mistake as a fix, which is what happened
here before the rule existed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011ZqCxSQVpmM9Rx37C7irgf
Change-Id: Ibc32514be641d37277115faf6068e75ea02e0083
…the claim

The skill test coverage gate requires a test change with any rule-shaped
SKILL.md change. The new entailment rule gets a fires_ example, matching how
the subagent-contradiction rule got fires_subagent_contradiction.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HQ9TkZeqARxv3e7W7xesYy
Change-Id: Ia60c5c6a87b249bb186b83a5be5b0717603536bd
@mergify mergify Bot closed this Sep 14, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/6d4cdcd9b0 branch September 14, 2026 04:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant