Add SystemSettingsAdminFlows.exe - #518
ashish-cybersec wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
Removed Code_Sample section from SystemSettingsAdminFlows.yml.
Updated detection rules and analysis links for SystemSettingsAdminFlows.
wietze
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @ashish-cybersec ,
Thanks for your submission. We've had a PR for the exact same last year, #420, but I could not replicate the behavior on modern Windows. The reports you link are both describing intrusions from 2024.
Could you please provide evidence of these still working on a recent Windows 11 version please?
|
@wietze Thanks — I tested this properly rather than relying on the reports. Result: I can't reproduce it either, and Tamper Protection isn't the reason. Test environment:
Ran all four commands from my entry, twice — once with Tamper Protection
Every command exits silently with no error and no exit code returned (blank So this looks like your guess from #420 was right: Microsoft appears to have Both sources I cited describe 2024 intrusions, as you spotted — so the Given that, I'm happy to close this unless you think a Win10/Server-only entry |


Adds an OSBinaries entry for SystemSettingsAdminFlows.exe, the Settings app's
elevation helper, documenting four Defender configuration flows that are
invokable directly from the command line.
On the criteria. The unexpected functionality here isn't that the binary
changes Defender settings — it's that those flows are reachable as command-line
arguments from any elevated process, entirely outside the Settings UI and its
confirmation path. Notably, this route touches neither Set-MpPreference nor a
direct registry write, which is where most existing Defender-tamper detections
are anchored. Categorised as Tamper per CategoryList.md, mapped to T1562.001.
Observed in the wild by two independent reporters:
https://thedfirreport.com/2026/02/23/apache-activemq-exploit-leads-to-lockbit-ransomware/
Detection. Process-creation and Defender Operational IOCs, plus the SigmaHQ
rule written for this technique (da92713f-ca2d-4fab-8320-098013d3f43a), which
cites the same two sources.
The entry covers the four arguments reported in those two intrusions. The Sigma
rule additionally matches
RealTimeProtectionandDisableCDPUserAuthPolicy—happy to fold those in if you'd prefer fuller coverage.
Passes validation.py and .yamllint locally. First submission, so please tell me
what to fix.