Skip to content

CI check: stacked verification of PRs #373 #310 #377 #356 #378 - #384

Closed
jmanico wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
verify-clean-prs
Closed

CI check: stacked verification of PRs #373 #310 #377 #356 #378#384
jmanico wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
verify-clean-prs

Conversation

@jmanico

@jmanico jmanico commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Temporary draft to run the build matrix against the pending PRs merged together on top of main. PR #362 was dropped from the stack (see review there). Will be closed without merging once the checks report; the individual PRs get merged instead.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01SKUuD1GhUfpvrDvJen6r91

csware and others added 11 commits January 28, 2024 15:47
Signed-off-by: Sven Strickroth <email@cs-ware.de>
- Add colspan and rowspan support to TABLES policy with integer validation.
- Add loading attribute to IMAGES policy with lazy and eager whitelist.
- Relocate INTEGER AttributePolicy for shared use between TABLES and IMAGES.

Signed-off-by: hwangjeyeon <kingpele9018@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hwangjeyeon <kingpele9018@gmail.com>
@jmanico jmanico changed the title CI check: stacked verification of PRs #373 #310 #377 #356 #378 #362 CI check: stacked verification of PRs #373 #310 #377 #356 #378 Sep 7, 2026
@jmanico

jmanico commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Verification complete. All 335 sanitizer tests pass with #373, #310, #377, #356 and #378 stacked on main. The build failure on this draft came from the empiricism module on main itself (Dependabot PR #383 bumped the module's own version), not from any of the stacked PRs. Closing without merging as intended.

@jmanico jmanico closed this Sep 7, 2026
@jmanico
jmanico deleted the verify-clean-prs branch September 7, 2026 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants