Skip to content

docs: exclude pay per event + usage Actors from agentic payment eligibility - #2872

Draft
marcel-rbro wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/x402-ppe-usage-eligibility
Draft

docs: exclude pay per event + usage Actors from agentic payment eligibility#2872
marcel-rbro wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/x402-ppe-usage-eligibility

Conversation

@marcel-rbro

@marcel-rbro marcel-rbro commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #2892

The agentic payments eligibility criteria were incomplete and duplicated verbatim on three pages, so Actor developers kept hitting ineligibility unexpectedly.

What changed

  • Added the PPE + usage exclusion. Actors with the Pay per event + usage option switched on aren't eligible, but the existing wording ("Use the pay-per-event pricing model") read as though they were.
  • Added the KYC requirement. A developer who hasn't completed identity verification has no eligible Actors, regardless of pricing model or permissions. This wasn't documented anywhere.
  • Dropped the stale "Standby support is coming later" sentence.
  • Extracted the list into sources/_partials/_agentic-payments-eligibility.mdx, replacing the three verbatim copies (x402, Skyfire, monetization), so the next change to the criteria only has to be made once.

Each page keeps its own lead-in sentence. The KYC criterion is phrased as a separate sentence rather than a bullet, because it's a property of the developer, not of the Actor.

Verified locally

  • pnpm build passes; the partial renders on all three pages and the #verify-your-identity anchor resolves.
  • The llms-txt generated .md output flattens the partial correctly on all three pages - no duplication or misattached content.
  • markdownlint clean; Vale reports 0 errors and 0 warnings on the new partial.

Open question for reviewers (carried over, still unresolved)

The x402 page documents the prepaid-token flow, where the resulting token behaves like a regular API token. If the pricing-model and Standby restrictions don't apply on that path, the Supported Actors section on that page needs a rewrite rather than a shared criteria list - happy to handle that as a follow-up.

…bility

Actors that pass platform usage costs on to users are not eligible for
agentic payments, but the criteria lists did not say so. Add the missing
criterion to the x402, Skyfire, and monetization pages.
@marcel-rbro marcel-rbro self-assigned this Aug 12, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team. label Aug 12, 2026
@apify-service-account

apify-service-account commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Preview for this PR (commit 1a837495) is ready at https://pr-2872.preview.docs.apify.com (see action run).

The eligibility list was duplicated verbatim on three pages and was
missing two criteria, so developers hit ineligibility unexpectedly.

- Add the KYC requirement. Without identity verification, none of a
  developer's Actors are eligible, regardless of pricing model.
- Drop the stale "Standby support is coming later" sentence.
- Replace the three copies of the list with a shared partial, so the
  next change to the criteria only has to be made once.

Closes #2892

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Complete and single-source the agentic payments eligibility criteria

2 participants