docs: improve documentation titles and add proxy type links

[jancurn]

Improved consistency and clarity across documentation by updating page titles to use gerund forms and adding internal links to related proxy documentation.

Key changes:

• Updated Actor section titles to use gerund forms ("Developing Actors", "Publishing Actors", "Monetizing Actors", "Running Actors") for consistency with documentation conventions
• Added internal links to proxy type documentation in the proxy parameters table (datacenter, residential, and Google SERP proxies) to improve navigation and discoverability

https://claude.ai/code/session_01WMamf9TfuBnQiKFwxXaLVM

[apify-service-account]

✅ Preview for this PR (commit a73845c) is ready at https://pr-2890.preview.docs.apify.com (see action run).

[TC-MO]

Hey @jancurn thanks for the update to links, valid change. Regarding the gerunds the PR description mentions that this is for consistency with documentation conventions but our convention is actually opposite. As you can see in CONTRIBUTING.md, Quality standards for AI (here & here) & Msoft style guide that we also follow.

[jancurn]

@TC-MO Oh right, I didn't know about the gerunds. Perhaps these rules should be copied in AGENTS.md too, so the agents pick them up?

The reason why I changed it is that the imperative form (Run, Develop, Publish, Monetize) is suitable for landing pages but doesn't feel right for docs:

How about using "Actor running", "Actor development", "Actor publishing", "Actor monetization" instead of gerunds?

[jancurn]

@TC-MO here is another PR to ensure agents respect CONTIBUTING.md - #2893

[TC-MO]

I'll take a separate look on #2893 to keep this on topic of PR :)

Let's keep imperatives here. One of our goals is more task-based docs and these four sections are exactly that. The Run section is a landing page but also includes what is necessary to run Actors. Publish, Monetize & Develop work in the same way.

On adding Actor to each of those, we are already in Actors section I see little if not none value in that addition. It would only serve to be more visually cluttered.

[jancurn]

Do you have some examples of top docs using the imperatives? I don't recall seeing this anywhere, except for marketing pages. I didn't mean to add "Actor" to menu, but have it in the page title.