Handle invalid BridgeManager interface names safely#796
Open
fallintoplace wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
BridgeManager.make(...)path for eager interface-name validationpreconditionfor bridge and egress interface validation so invalid input comes back as.invalidArgumentWhy
BridgeManager.initcurrently treats invalid interface names as a programming error and traps the process. That is rough for CLI and API callers because bad user input turns into a crash instead of a normal error.This change keeps the existing initializer source-compatible, validates before
create()anddelete()touch host state, and gives the CLI a throwing construction path so invalid names are reported cleanly.Validation
git diff --check