Skip to content

Revert dual writes for spanner DB - #654

Merged
vish-cs merged 2 commits into
datacommonsorg:masterfrom
vish-cs:db
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

Revert dual writes for spanner DB#654
vish-cs merged 2 commits into
datacommonsorg:masterfrom
vish-cs:db

Conversation

@vish-cs

@vish-cs vish-cs commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR makes the following changes:
a) Remove dual writes to ingestion status tables (eliminate SPANNER_GRAPH_DATABASE_ID var)
b) Remove temporary ingestion tables (v3) to clean up the ingestion workflow
c) Migrate the auto-refresh pipeline to a new DB in dc-graph-staging

@vish-cs
vish-cs requested a review from n-h-diaz July 17, 2026 05:02

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the hardcoded Spanner table names spannerObservationTableName and spannerTimeSeriesTableName from the run_dataflow_job step in the Spanner ingestion workflow. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics -4 complexity

Metric Results
Complexity -4

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@vish-cs vish-cs changed the title Revert temp spanner table names Revert dual writes for spanner DB Jul 27, 2026
@vish-cs
vish-cs requested a review from gmechali July 27, 2026 07:01
@vish-cs
vish-cs force-pushed the db branch 2 times, most recently from e3103e6 to 6e277d4 Compare July 27, 2026 07:41
@vish-cs
vish-cs merged commit 7bf2470 into datacommonsorg:master Jul 27, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants