docs: note containerd store for local cache with docker driver - #25800
Open
locker95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: note containerd store for local cache with docker driver#25800locker95 wants to merge 1 commit into
locker95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Match the overview and registry backend pages so readers know local cache on the default docker driver needs the containerd image store. Signed-off-by: Dean Chen <862469039@qq.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The cache backends overview says
localworks with the default docker driver when the containerd image store is enabled, but the local backend page never said that.Added the same driver note used on the registry (and GHA) pages.
Follow-up to the inconsistency called out in #25396.