Skip to content

[Docs] Service groups and Replica IP interpolation - #4185

Merged
Bihan merged 2 commits into
dstackai:masterfrom
Bihan:docs_service_groups_and_interpolation
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

[Docs] Service groups and Replica IP interpolation#4185
Bihan merged 2 commits into
dstackai:masterfrom
Bihan:docs_service_groups_and_interpolation

Conversation

@Bihan

@Bihan Bihan commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@Bihan
Bihan requested a review from peterschmidt85 August 21, 2026 08:20

@peterschmidt85 peterschmidt85 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left few minor comments

Comment thread mkdocs/docs/concepts/services.md Outdated
@@ -291,7 +291,8 @@ Setting the minimum number of replicas to `0` allows the service to scale down t
<span id="replica-groups"></span>

??? info "Replica groups"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why its collapsible section? Shouldn't we do it similar to Tasks - as a separate section?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, shouldn't we cross-link Replica groups and PD disaggregation sections?

Comment thread mkdocs/docs/concepts/services.md Outdated

> Properties such as `regions`, `port`, `env` and some other cannot be configured per replica group. This support is coming soon.

### Accessing replica IPs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be under "Replica groups" section?
Also shall we make it collapsible ("???") section?

@Bihan
Bihan merged commit 3a47fab into dstackai:master Aug 24, 2026
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants