Process Launcher Unit Test - #680
Open
WilliamRoebuck wants to merge 12 commits into
Open
WilliamRoebuck wants to merge 12 commits into
WilliamRoebuck wants to merge 12 commits into
Conversation
WilliamRoebuck
requested review from
FScholPer,
MaciejKaszynski,
NicolasFussberger,
anmittag,
antonkri,
pawelrutkaq and
ramceb
as code owners
September 22, 2026 15:39
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 22, 2026 15:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 22, 2026 15:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 22, 2026 15:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 22, 2026 15:39 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
force-pushed
the
feature/process_launcher_UT
branch
from
September 22, 2026 15:53
3d31afc to
e5789ce
Compare
MaciejKaszynski
requested changes
Sep 23, 2026
MaciejKaszynski
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's resolve the comments on the impl, then I'll look at the UT as it might change
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:15 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:15 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:19 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:19 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
force-pushed
the
feature/process_launcher_UT
branch
from
September 23, 2026 10:22
b333824 to
e3610d0
Compare
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:22 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
force-pushed
the
feature/process_launcher_UT
branch
from
September 23, 2026 10:37
e3610d0 to
8b0a24a
Compare
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:37 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
WilliamRoebuck
requested a deployment
to
workflow-approval
September 23, 2026 10:37 — with
GitHub Actions
Waiting
|
|
||
| // NOLINTBEGIN - clang-tidy does not like syscalls | ||
|
|
||
| class SyscallMock |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can all of this be put into mock_proc_launch_syscalls.hpp You have to scroll quite a bit to get to the actual test.
This branch is waiting to be deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
98.5% line coverage for the file using syscall and osal mocks.
There are two remaining uncovered regions:
Some refactoring has been done to make the area more testable:
One small bug fixed:
noexceptinstead ofnoexcept(false)