First crack at adding a formal version type in response to CVEProject/cve-schema#362 (comment) Any others which are agreed upon should be spun up in their own PRs so that conversations in the PRs can be kept on topic
Happy to expand this if people think the full semver spec should be in this repo as well. I went back and forth on that.
Another thought is that maybe this should be a retroactive definition of the semver type. That would likely be breaking for some of the current records though.
The goal here is to have strict validation provided by cve services
Originally posted by @darakian in CVEProject/cve-schema#371
First crack at adding a formal version type in response to CVEProject/cve-schema#362 (comment) Any others which are agreed upon should be spun up in their own PRs so that conversations in the PRs can be kept on topic
Happy to expand this if people think the full semver spec should be in this repo as well. I went back and forth on that.
Another thought is that maybe this should be a retroactive definition of the
semvertype. That would likely be breaking for some of the current records though.The goal here is to have strict validation provided by cve services
Originally posted by @darakian in CVEProject/cve-schema#371