Skip to content

fix(toolkit): keep source DB intact when DbMove copy fails - #140

Open
halibobo1205 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
feature/dbmove-data-safety
Open

fix(toolkit): keep source DB intact when DbMove copy fails#140
halibobo1205 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
feature/dbmove-data-safety

Conversation

@halibobo1205

@halibobo1205 halibobo1205 commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

User description

Prevent the prior flow from deleting source databases after logging and ignoring per-file copy errors.

Preserve every source until all configured databases copy successfully. Roll back partial destinations, handle recursive database contents, and return a non-zero status on failure.

Finalize symlinks only after the copy phase completes, report completion once, and cover rollback and direct retry behavior in DbMoveTest.


CodeAnt-AI Description

Make database moves fail safely and preserve source data

What Changed

  • Copy failures now return an error, keep every source database unchanged, and remove partial destination copies.
  • Database contents are copied recursively, including empty directories; symbolic links and unsupported entries are rejected without modifying their targets.
  • Invalid or overlapping source and destination paths, including dangling destination links, are rejected before any files are changed.
  • Source databases are replaced with links only after all copies succeed; failed finalization keeps the complete copy and prints manual recovery instructions.
  • Configuration options work consistently regardless of their order, and the move can be retried after a temporary copy failure.

Impact

✅ Source databases preserved after failed moves
✅ No partial destination copies after copy errors
✅ Safer handling of nested paths and symbolic links

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

Prevent the prior flow from deleting source databases after logging and ignoring per-file copy errors.

Preserve every source until all configured databases copy successfully. Roll back partial destinations, handle recursive database contents, and return a non-zero status on failure.

Finalize symlinks only after the copy phase completes, report completion once, and cover rollback and direct retry behavior in DbMoveTest.
@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 CodeAnt AI — Review Status

Status Commit Started (UTC) Finished (UTC)
✅ Reviewed your PR e106186 Aug 04, 2026 · 05:20 05:24

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files label Aug 4, 2026
Comment on lines +131 to +136
try (Stream<Path> files = Files.walk(p.original)) {
ProgressBar.wrap(files.parallel(), p.name).forEach(source -> {
try {
copyEntry(p, source);
} catch (IOException e) {
hasError.set(true);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: The copy phase traverses and copies a live database tree without stopping the database, acquiring a lock, or taking a snapshot. Concurrent database writes can produce a destination containing files from inconsistent points in time, after which the source is deleted and replaced by a link. The move must require an offline database or use a consistent database-level snapshot/lock. [incomplete implementation]

Severity Level: Critical 🚨
- ❌ Running-node moves can produce inconsistent RocksDB copies.
- ❌ Finalization can replace the source with incomplete state.
- ⚠️ Restarted nodes may require database recovery or rollback.

Fix in Cursor Fix in VSCode Claude

(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
This is a comment left during a code review.

**Path:** plugins/src/main/java/common/org/tron/plugins/DbMove.java
**Line:** 131:136
**Comment:**
	*Incomplete Implementation: The copy phase traverses and copies a live database tree without stopping the database, acquiring a lock, or taking a snapshot. Concurrent database writes can produce a destination containing files from inconsistent points in time, after which the source is deleted and replaced by a link. The move must require an offline database or use a consistent database-level snapshot/lock.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix
👍 | 👎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant