Skip to content

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.3 - #9195

Open
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x
Open

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.3#9195
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x

Conversation

@hash-dependencies

@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change Pending
jdx/mise minor 2026.7.14 → 2026.8.3 2026.8.12 (+8)

Release Notes

jdx/mise (jdx/mise)

v2026.8.3

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
New Contributors
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (6)
Updated Packages (3)

v2026.8.2

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
New Contributors

v2026.8.1

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
New Contributors

v2026.8.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (2)
Updated Packages (6)

v2026.7.18

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
📦 Registry
New Contributors
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (1)
Updated Packages (1)

v2026.7.17

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
📚 Documentation
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (2)
Updated Packages (3)

v2026.7.16

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
New Contributors

v2026.7.15

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore

✂ Note

PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview Aug 21, 2026 10:57pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview Aug 21, 2026 10:57pm
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview Aug 21, 2026 10:57pm
petrinaut-docs Ready Ready Preview Aug 21, 2026 10:57pm

@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot enabled auto-merge August 11, 2026 00:31
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches the shared CI/dev toolchain installer, so a bad mise release could break tool installs repo-wide. The diff itself is version pins only.

Overview
Bumps the pinned mise version from 2026.7.14 to 2026.8.3 in all three pin sites: min_version in mise config, the bootstrap install.sh download, and the GitHub install-tools action.

No install or CI logic changes besides the version string.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 46913fb. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Aug 11, 2026
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 11, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64] 140.8 ns 170 ns -17.16%
❌ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200] 185.8 ns 215 ns -13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing deps/jdx-mise-2026.x (46913fb) with main (206ca32)

Open in CodSpeed

TimDiekmann
TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Aug 11, 2026
View reviewed changes
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from e48dd5c to 1f05342 Compare August 12, 2026 09:34
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.15 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.16 Aug 12, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.85%. Comparing base (357589c) to head (46913fb).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9195      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.71%   59.85%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files        1423     1426       +3     
  Lines      138862   139570     +708     
  Branches     6572     6585      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        82915    83536     +621     
- Misses      54881    54964      +83     
- Partials     1066     1070       +4
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 14.66% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 12.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 2.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.24% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 11.00% <ø> (+3.50%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-authentication 91.78% <ø> (+7.81%) ⬆️
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-embeddings 91.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 29.33% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 46.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 84.71% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 89.63% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.39% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 78.98% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 79.82% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 87.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from 1f05342 to e19191f Compare August 13, 2026 03:04
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.16 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.17 Aug 13, 2026
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from e19191f to 4301fbd Compare August 13, 2026 22:23
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.17 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.18 Aug 13, 2026
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from 4301fbd to 2ea3f1c Compare August 15, 2026 21:11
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.7.18 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.0 Aug 15, 2026
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from 2ea3f1c to 40d46fb Compare August 17, 2026 18:52
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.0 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.1 Aug 17, 2026
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from 40d46fb to 5d9a485 Compare August 19, 2026 02:34
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.1 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.2 Aug 19, 2026
@hash-dependencies
hash-dependencies Bot force-pushed the deps/jdx-mise-2026.x branch from 5d9a485 to 46913fb Compare August 21, 2026 22:45
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.2 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.8.3 Aug 21, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$22.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$4.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.603 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$76.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.08 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$9.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$9.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$9.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$9.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$9.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$9.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$9.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$9.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$9.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.768 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$9.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$9.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$9.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$9.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$9.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.700 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$9.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$9.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$9.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$9.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$6.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$56.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 612 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$61.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 427 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$70.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.148 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$78.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 778 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$83.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 623 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.699 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$57.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$55.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 676 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 694 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$468 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann TimDiekmann left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@TimDiekmann