fix(ci): resync actions.lock and add a lock-sync recurrence gate #566
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
| # SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0 | ||
| name: Lock Sync Gate | ||
|
|
||
| # Fails any pull request whose .github/workflows/actions.lock has drifted from | ||
| # the workflow YAML. That drift is not cosmetic: GitHub refuses such a run at | ||
| # startup, creating ZERO jobs, and reports only "This run likely failed because | ||
| # of a workflow file issue." A single grouped Dependabot bump can take out most | ||
| # of a repository's CI that way, because Dependabot rewrites `uses:` refs in the | ||
| # YAML and cannot touch the lockfile. Measured across 200 repositories on | ||
| # 2026-09-22: 39 had silently dead CI from exactly this cause. | ||
| # See hyperpolymath/standards#968. | ||
| # | ||
| # This workflow deliberately carries NO `uses:` of its own. It checks out by | ||
| # calling git in a `run:` step instead of using actions/checkout, so it has no | ||
| # lockfile entry to go stale and is structurally immune to the very failure it | ||
| # detects. Do not add a `uses:` to this file. | ||
| # | ||
| # There is also no `paths:` filter, on purpose: a filtered workflow never | ||
| # reports on pull requests that miss the filter, which deadlocks any branch | ||
| # ruleset that requires this check. | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| push: | ||
| branches: [main] | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read | ||
|
|
||
| concurrency: | ||
| group: lock-sync-gate-${{ github.ref }} | ||
| cancel-in-progress: true | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| lock-sync: | ||
| name: actions.lock is in sync with the workflow YAML | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| timeout-minutes: 5 | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Check out without actions/checkout | ||
| env: | ||
| REPO: ${{ github.repository }} | ||
| SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }} | ||
| TOKEN: ${{ github.token }} | ||
| run: | | ||
| set -euo pipefail | ||
| # Authenticate the fetch. An anonymous clone works only for public | ||
| # repositories; this gate must also run on private ones. The header | ||
| # form is used rather than a token in the remote URL so the | ||
| # credential is never written into .git/config. | ||
| AUTH="AUTHORIZATION: basic $(printf 'x-access-token:%s' "${TOKEN}" | base64 -w0)" | ||
| git init -q . | ||
| git remote add origin "https://github.com/${REPO}.git" | ||
| git -c http.extraheader="${AUTH}" fetch -q --depth 1 origin "${SHA}" | ||
| git checkout -q FETCH_HEAD | ||
| echo "checked out ${SHA}" | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Verify lockfile synchronisation | ||
| run: | | ||
| set -euo pipefail | ||
| test -x scripts/check-lock-sync.sh \ | ||
| || { echo "::error::scripts/check-lock-sync.sh missing or not executable"; exit 1; } | ||
| ./scripts/check-lock-sync.sh |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🔎 Supported by static analysis
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: hyperpolymath/gitbot-fleet
Length of output: 28212
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: hyperpolymath/gitbot-fleet
Length of output: 42192
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: hyperpolymath/gitbot-fleet
Length of output: 24898
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: hyperpolymath/gitbot-fleet
Length of output: 42318
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: hyperpolymath/gitbot-fleet
Length of output: 44233
Gate criterion 5.2.6 on both
juliaanddocs-site.The applicability model checks only the single capability in
gate. Since criterion5.2.6setsgate = "julia", any profile that declaresjuliaenters this criterion, even when it does not declaredocs-site.The report then parses the description as required documentation paths. A Julia repository without those paths can receive a missing finding. Extend the capability model to support the
juliaanddocs-siteconjunction, or add an equivalent guard before reporting the criterion.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents