ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #257
Conversation
…tia` The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is `hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named `hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published `scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17). Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep — hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (27)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe workflow job ID changed from ChangesHypatia workflow
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Change: Bug fix 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains the reason for the rename and confirms that only the job identifier changed. It does not follow the repository template because it omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections. Resolution Update the description to use the repository template. Add the required Summary and Changes sections, complete the RSR Quality Checklist, and document the testing performed. Add Screenshots output or state that screenshots are not applicable.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checks the workflow name Comment |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
The check a reusable-caller job publishes is
<caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context ishypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis(docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be namedhypatia. This wrapper named itscan, and so publishedscan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis— two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.
Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is
--fixoutput fromscripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.shinhyperpolymath/standards(the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.