feat(untyped): standardization theorem for the lambda calculus#679
Conversation
|
Looking for your next pr ! |
|
Could you share your next PR related to "leftmost reduction"? |
|
Hi! @lengyijun My branch is still a bit too messy to share right now, but I expect to open the PR very soon. |
7f7a6cd to
93dfbbb
Compare
|
opened #700 :) |
chenson2018
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems straightforward, just some style nitpicks.
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…dReduction.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
…ame.lean Co-authored-by: Chris Henson <46805207+chenson2018@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Thanks a lot for the review! Let me know if anything else needs changing. |
chenson2018
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@m-ow Thanks! I did a little bit of miscellaneous cleanups myself, in the hope of getting to your next PR a bit quicker. You might have a look for future reference.
This PR proves the standardization theorem: if
Mbeta-reduces toNin any number of steps, thenNis reachable fromMby a standard reduction.Builds on #671.