Skip to content

Plugins configuration is confusing / ambiguous #8

Description

@vboctor

I originally assumed that the plugin is designed to have one or more child custom fields that are dependent on a parent custom field.

For example:

  • Parent
  • Child1 that has values dependent on Parent
  • Child2 that has values dependent of Parent.

However, it seems that the plugin is designed to config the Parent -> Child relationship and save this under the parent. That is unfortunate, since it is a more limited design that assume 1 Parent controls 1 Child custom field.

It may be too late to fix that, but at least we should use terminology "Parent Custom Field" and "Child Custom Field" instead of "Custom Field" and "Linked Custom Field", since the latter is ambiguous and can be confusing.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions