Add Cars/Fastly blog posts#105
Conversation
Replace placeholder alt text on every figure with descriptions of the actual drawings, and fix a few typos while keeping the writing style. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 51 minutes and 16 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughTwo new MDX blog post pages are added under 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/pages/blog/cars2.mdx`:
- Line 202: In the sentence containing "big deal" and "flakey venue internet",
correct the spelling of the adjective "flakey" to "flaky". This is the standard
English spelling for describing something unreliable or prone to breaking apart.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: aa160777-f272-43ee-a07a-14b824ba3ea4
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (13)
public/blog/cars2/backfill.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/backfill2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/f1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/fanout.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/fanout2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/kixel.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/latency.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/ll.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/mom.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/queen.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/speed.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/speed2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpublic/blog/cars2/toilet.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/pages/blog/cars2.mdxsrc/pages/blog/moq-cars-fastly.mdx
Adds the two sponsored Fastly blog posts and polishes them.
Posts
blog/cars2— "MoQ is for the Cars" (the unhinged Lightning McQueen version)blog/moq-cars-fastly— "MoQ in the Fast Lane" (the hinged F1 version, cross-posted to Fastly's blog)Polish (latest commit)
![Cars 2]/![Fastly Lane]repeated on every figure) with descriptions of what's actually drawn. Kept the![@kixelated]author-signature avatars to match the convention across other posts.staring→starring;companies insisting on running→companies insist on running;inidividual→individual;That's why use timestamps→That's why we use timestamps. Writing style left intact.Deployed to staging (moq.wtf) and
just checkpasses.🤖 Generated with Claude Code