Skip to content

no-loop implementation #141

Description

@pablotdl

Hi,

would it be possible to implement the no-loop clause in the DSL so that a rule is not re evaluated as a consequence of its RHS expression modifying the facts?

That'd simplify rule creation a great deal for some use cases.

Thanks in advance.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions