Skip to content

Repository files navigation

loopmarket

license

A universal combinatorial marketplace over the ontodag / recordstore / Ethereum Swarm stack.

Every economic intention is one uniform, content-addressed offer — a thing described as a conjunction of OntoDAG categories, with a service time window and region, priced on the maker's personal scale (a personal numeraire; the record encoding calls it the maker's personal token). A distributed, versioned offer book holds them (recordstore keyspace; Swarm-backed via BeeBytesStore + a signed SwarmFeedPointer). Competing solver agents hunt profitable loops — cycles whose exchange-rate product exceeds one, i.e. negative cycles under −log weights — and a clearing layer re-verifies every leg from scratch and commits the whole loop atomically.

$ odag put piano-lesson music-lesson        # the catalogue is ontodag's
$ loop set maker amara; loop place home 46.05,14.50,5km; loop set where home
$ loop give piano-lesson 100                # I give this, priced on my scale
$ loop want produce local weekly 104        # I want this, priced on my scale
$ loop loops && loop clearing               # hunt profitable loops; run the clearing house

loop is the command line (pip install loopmarket): ontodag's grammar plus two conventions — a bare number first is the quantity, last is the price — and + between the parts of a want that must clear together; every name a catalogue node, an omitted price your last unit price, and nothing published before the fully resolved offer is shown. Type loop alone for a prompt, pipe it a script for a batch. The same in Python:

from recordstore import MemoryBytesStore, RecordStore
from loopmarket import (Ontology, OfferRegistry, MockClearing,
                        SolverAgent, Thing, give, want, ...)

ontology = Ontology().load({"produce": [], "vegetable-box": ["produce"], ...})
registry = OfferRegistry(RecordStore(MemoryBytesStore()))
registry.publish_many([...])          # gives and wants, one uniform form
registry.commit()

agent = SolverAgent(registry, ontology, MockClearing(registry, ontology))
agent.step()                          # snapshot → match → hunt loops → clear

Try it

pip install -e ".[test]"              # (--break-system-packages or a venv)
python3 -m pytest tests/ -v           # 99 tests (two need a live Bee node)
LOOP_HOME=$(mktemp -d) loop --catalogue examples/triangle.od < examples/triangle.loop   # P0 as a script
PYTHONPATH=src python3 examples/demo_triangle.py     # the same, through the API
PYTHONPATH=src python3 examples/demo_federation.py   # P1: books, fold, forgery, follower

The script publishes the smallest nontrivial book — a piano teacher, a market gardener and a bicycle mechanic, no pair of whom can trade — and loops && clear finds, verifies and clears the triangle at a 12% surplus: fifteen lines of set maker, give piano-lesson where(amara_flat) 100, want produce local weekly .... It runs unchanged with the book on Swarm (loop -f swarm:TOPIC ..., about two minutes on a light node). The federation demo runs per-maker books, two aggregators folding to byte-identical manifests, a forged offer dying at the fold, a tombstoned offer staying closed, clearing provably based on the fold, and a follower reading it all back — in memory by default, live against a Bee node when BEE_API and BEE_BATCH are set. New here? Start with the User Guide (a tutorial at the command line, with the API alongside), then the Reference Manual (commands, settings, API, record formats, invariants). loop help is the one-screen version; the design record with its reasons is docs/plans/cli.md.

Candidate generation can also run through ontodag's parametric dimensions: DimensionIndex files gives under their exact service window and centre cell, and candidate_matches_indexed prunes by concept cones and window overlap — provably the same matches as the exhaustive baseline (the recall test enforces set-equality), with far fewer exact checks. The index is a derived, per-solver copy; the shared catalogue and its pinned roots never move because of it. Swap the in-memory store for recordstore.swarm_store("offers", signer=...) (extra: pip install -e ".[swarm]", plus a Bee node and a postage batch) and the same code runs with the book on Swarm.

What is built, and what is designed

Built (P0, plus the live-Swarm milestone): the full pipeline above runs in memory — and, since 2026-09-12, from the command line (loop) — and since 2026-08-01 also end-to-end on a real Gnosis-mainnet Bee node — catalogue and book on Swarm, book head in a signed feed, fills atomic (the gated tests/test_swarm_book.py). Since 2026-08-21 the federation layer runs too — in memory and live (the gated tests/test_swarm_federation.py, 96.5s on a Bee 2.8.1 node): per-maker books under their own feeds and signers, an Aggregator folding them under the U8 admission rules into a four-root manifest published on its own feed, withdrawal tombstones, and a scorched-earth follower reconstructing the cleared world from (address, topic) alone. Since 2026-09-04 the federation demo adopts ontodag's core pack as the catalogue and includes a censoring aggregator: audit_manifest convicts it from its own manifest with absence proofs, and a solver folding the announced maker books itself recovers the honest fold (T14). Alpha; interfaces will move.

Designed (2026-08-07): most of what loopmarket is now lives as a decided, research-grounded plan corpus under docs/plans/ — one document per work package, each with measurable gates, named open problems, and a closing "what this document does not promise" section. Anything implying unbuilt code carries a dated marker ("decided 2026-08, lands with the v2 bump / P1 / P2"). Planned invariants U8–U14 are specified in the documents that motivate them and summarized across ARCHITECTURE.md's update notes and §11; they enter CLAUDE.md as binding invariants only when their enforcing code and tests land. factbond's mirror corpus is factbond/docs/plans/.

Vocabulary

Three words carry the design and are used precisely since 2026-09-07:

  • loop — any cleared circulation: the essay's word and the name in code (Loop, LoopProposal, loop/, loop_id).
  • cycle (simple loop) — the strict circle; all the P0 solver finds, and the only case where "the product of rates around it" means anything.
  • circulation — the technical name for the cleared object: a flow conserved at every maker on that maker's own scale, with composed legs where one want takes several gives (docs/plans/P2-loop-selection.md §10–11).
  • hyper-leg — a composed leg: several givers as tails, one wanting maker as head, one flow variable, so it fills every tail or none. The maker graph with hyper-legs is a hypergraph; its flow is an LP for divisible legs and an ILP where a hyper-leg is all-or-nothing.

And two more: clearing is the atomic commit that fixes obligations; settlement is the makers delivering.

The plan corpus

Document One line
P1-federated-book.md Per-maker books under own feeds/signers; announcement, aggregation, merge discipline, lifecycle, postage economics, spam floors.
P2-batch-auction.md The beat: sealed proposals, numeraire-free scoring, the fairness floor, capped solver rewards, collusion resistance, fees.
P2-clearing-pricing.md Turning a winning loop's surplus into per-leg prices: equal log-surplus split under uniform directional clearing; clearing prices as node potentials (§10).
P2-loop-selection.md Clearing as optimization: flow LP vs packing ILP, chains, failure-aware objective, pre-commit compression; composition on the want side (§10); the cleared object is a circulation, clearing prices its node potentials (§11).
proof-fabric.md Cross-phase proofs and certificates: trie proofs vs POT, the pin table, certificate envelopes, absence proofs.
P3-guarantee-coupling.md loopmarket's half of the factbond coupling: witness edges, reliance-capped insurance, oracle consumption, risk-priced routing.
P4-privacy.md Staged privacy: Tier 1 with zero new cryptography, the P2 format-freeze list, explicit dead/deferred rulings.
ontodag-coupling.md The catalogue contract: dimension terms, unit families, match degrees, the upstream-vs-local tripwire table.
cli.md The command line (designed 2026-09-11, built 2026-09-12 as loop): ontodag's grammar plus quantity-first/price-last, every name a catalogue node, last-price memory, "declare in the direction you know" instead of a tolerance parameter, the approval block, batch scripts; what is still open (fold/audit/propose, U8 for peers, the upstream asks).
catalogue-bootstrap.md Seeding and governing the shared catalogue: seed taxonomies, the import pipeline, norms as protocol rules.
adoption-and-thickness.md Where the first loops come from: launch verticals, the broker surface, bridge liquidity, thickness engineering.
THREATS.md The threat register, T1–T9, ordered by expected damage to a young system; mirrored in factbond.
swarm-da (separate repo) Memo, 2026-09-09: what building this book on Swarm taught about Swarm as a data-availability layer — the archival-DA opportunity, Bee's push-sync receipts as the half-built publication primitive, and what loopmarket sheds the day they are exposed and anchored.

Phase ↔ document map. P1 (federation): P1-federated-book.md, supported by ontodag-coupling.md and catalogue-bootstrap.md, with cli.md as its tooling. P2 (verifiable clearing): the three P2 docs plus proof-fabric.md, constrained by P4-privacy.md's format-freeze list and gated by THREATS.md tripwires. P3 (guarantee fabric): P3-guarantee-coupling.md plus factbond's entire corpus — gated by factbond's Phase-0 simulation going green and the P2 format freeze. P4 (privacy): P4-privacy.md, whose Tier 1 may ship alongside P2. Cross-phase: proof-fabric.md, THREATS.md, adoption-and-thickness.md, catalogue-bootstrap.md, ontodag-coupling.md.

Reading order. First pass: ARCHITECTURE.mdTHREATS.mdP1-federated-book.md. Clearing track: P2-loop-selection.mdP2-clearing-pricing.mdP2-batch-auction.mdproof-fabric.md. Guarantee track: factbond DESIGN.mdmechanism-design.mdinsurance-products.mdphase0-simulation.mdP3-guarantee-coupling.md. Market track: adoption-and-thickness.mdcatalogue-bootstrap.mdontodag-coupling.md.

Order of documents is not order of construction — gates decide that; and a document's existence proves nothing about feasibility. The Phase-0 simulation and the named empirical gates can kill designs recorded here; the corpus is built so that they can.

Documentation

  • docs/USER-GUIDE.md — the tutorial: from your first offer to a federated book on a live Swarm network, every snippet runnable.
  • docs/REFERENCE.md — the reference manual: every public class and function, the keyspace, record formats, invariants, environment.
  • ARCHITECTURE.md — the design and its rationale: the uniform offer form, time/place as fits-within dimensions, the book's keyspace and multi-writer story, the loop arithmetic (and why prices are never negative), the trust model, the proof fabric, economic security, and what the architecture does not promise.
  • ROADMAP.md — the phase index with status: P0 (built) → P1 (federated book, live since 2026-08-21) → P2 (verifiable clearing, batch auctions) → P3 (guarantee fabric via factbond) → P4 (privacy), each linking to its plan document.
  • CLAUDE.md — working rules for development: dependency boundaries, core invariants U1–U7, known simplifications.
  • docs/loop-economy.md — the vision essay: the loop economy, its gallery of loops, the solver ecology, judges without swords, and the path in.

About

A universal, permissionless, combinatorial marketplace for products and services based on canonical offers.

Resources

Stars

2 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages