Add non-linearity to hidden state in char-RNN generation tutorial - #3956
Add non-linearity to hidden state in char-RNN generation tutorial#3956adityasharmaaaaa wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/3956
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks! |
Fixes #3953
Problem
The
RNN.forward()in this tutorial passed the hidden state straightthrough a linear layer with no activation:
This makes
h_ta linear combination ofh_{t-1}, the input, and thecategory tensor at every timestep —
nn.LogSoftmaxon the output wasthe only non-linear operation anywhere in the recurrence.
Fix
Added a
nn.Tanh()on the hidden path:This is a minimal, targeted fix for the specific issue raised — it
doesn't change
i2o,o2o, or dropout, so the rest of thearchitecture and surrounding explanation stay valid. Also added one
sentence to the "Creating the Network" section explaining why the
non-linearity is there.
Testing
Ran the tutorial locally for the full 100,000 iterations. Loss trends
down as expected (starts ~2.98, settles in the 1.4–2.4 range with
normal SGD noise), and sampled names after training look reasonable
(e.g.
Rovakin,Sarana,Chan), confirming the change doesn'tbreak training.