add coderabbit config for cross-repo knowledge#1178
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kanika Rana <krana@redhat.com>
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis PR updates the CodeRabbit configuration to enable configuration inheritance and establishes a knowledge base link to the ChangesCodeRabbit Configuration
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
5-9: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | ⚡ Quick winUse a literal YAML block (
|) so list-style guidance keeps line breaks.With folded style (
>), the bullet lines are folded into a single paragraph-like string, which can reduce readability and instruction fidelity for downstream consumers. Switching to|preserves the intended list formatting.Proposed diff
- instructions: > + instructions: | argocd-operator is a dependency for gitops-operator. Not all E2E tests that are in argocd-operator are in gitops-operator, and vice versa. When new tests are added to this repository, while reviewing: - check if these tests are specific to openshift - if these tests are not specific to openshift, check if these are being tested in argocd-operator too - if it is not specific to openshift and not being tested in argocd-operator, remind user that a sibling PR in argocd-operator may be needed.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 5 - 9, The YAML uses folded style for the instructions key which collapses list line breaks; change the scalar style for the instructions mapping by replacing the folded indicator (">") with the literal block indicator ("|") for the instructions field so the bullet list is preserved verbatim; locate the instructions: entry in the .coderabbit.yaml (the "instructions" scalar) and update the indicator and ensure existing indentation is kept so the list lines remain separate.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 5-9: The YAML uses folded style for the instructions key which
collapses list line breaks; change the scalar style for the instructions mapping
by replacing the folded indicator (">") with the literal block indicator ("|")
for the instructions field so the bullet list is preserved verbatim; locate the
instructions: entry in the .coderabbit.yaml (the "instructions" scalar) and
update the indicator and ensure existing indentation is kept so the list lines
remain separate.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: c7e5de13-19e3-4a25-af0a-8b3f2450107a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml
🔗 Linked repositories identified
CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
argoproj-labs/argocd-operator(manual)
|
@ranakan19: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What type of PR is this?
adds coderabbit config
What does this PR do / why we need it:
add coderabbit config for cross-repo awareness
Have you updated the necessary documentation?
N/A
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A
Test acceptance criteria:
N/A
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:
tiny improvement to address test gap between argocd-operator and gitops-operator