Rename extern "unadjusted" to extern "llvm-intrinsic" - #161398
Conversation
|
cc @tgross35 This PR changes rustc_public cc @oli-obk, @celinval, @ouz-a, @makai410
cc @rust-lang/miri
cc @Amanieu, @folkertdev, @sayantn |
|
r? @tgross35 rustbot has assigned @tgross35. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
515519e to
130b07c
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
130b07c to
e21f4cf
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
5b23cd8 to
c0dd7fd
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
c0dd7fd to
001d6e4
Compare
This makes it clear that it is only meant for LLVM intrinsics and not for defining or calling arbitrary user functions.
001d6e4 to
3f09e9e
Compare
|
CI passed. @tgross35 would you be able to take a look soon. This PR is fairly large, so it may be a bit bitrot prone. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM from the standpoint of this just being a renaming, but we should make sure the regular stdarch maintainers are aware.
@folkertdev @adamgemmell @sayantn is stdarch reasonably up to date with r-l/r so this isn't going to cause conflicts with the next sync?
(r=me after one of them confirm)
@bors rollup=iffy p=5
|
Yes, this shouldn't cause any (large) issues @bors r=tgross35 |
|
Bors preserves iffy/never but doesn't preserve priority? @bors p=5 |
This makes it clear that it is only meant for LLVM intrinsics and not for defining or calling arbitrary user functions.
Follow up to #160077