fix: android consumer-rules - #107
Conversation
R8 full mode stripped @structure.FieldOrder from UniFFI structs. Keep the annotation type and annotated classes so JNA can still lay out the structs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b333b30b79
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Ship FieldOrder and com.sun.jna.* keeps in the AAR. Library publish packages proguard.txt so a minified app can resolve JNI names and lay out JNA structs.
|
Merged without waiting on review. This only ships Android consumer keep rules in the AAR ( The Android PR is the actual enablement and the place to review the live impact. These changes were a port of the synonymdev/bitkit-core#145 PR changes which were reviewed and tested on android. |
Fixes #105
Follow-up to #106.
The Android AAR ships consumer keep rules for UniFFI/JNA so a minified app can resolve JNI names and lay out JNA structs.
Library publish packages
proguard.txtin the AAR. Minified-app R8 belongs in the consuming app.Description
com.sun.jna.*solibjnidispatchcan resolve JNI names onNative,Structure, andCallbackReference.com.sun.jna.*, includingcom.sun.jna.ptrByReference types used as UniFFI callback out-params.com.sun.jna.Structure$FieldOrderand annotatedorg.lightningdevkit.ldknodestruct classes, fields, and constructors.bundleReleaseAarwhen the AAR is missing a non-emptyproguard.txt.Out of scope
Preview
N/A — Android consumer keep rules only.
QA Notes
proguard.txtwith those consumer keep rules.Release