Skip to content

Try to speed up python wheel validation - #9847

Open
robert3005 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
rk/wheelsdist
Open

Try to speed up python wheel validation#9847
robert3005 wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
rk/wheelsdist

Conversation

@robert3005

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We seem to be doing a lot of wasteful work here. Trying something simpler

Signed-off-by: Robert Kruszewski <github@robertk.io>
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 5.58%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 2194 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 218 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
WallTime arrow_checked_add_u32_neon[16384] 12.3 µs 20.4 µs -39.56%
WallTime arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] 21.4 µs 17.6 µs +21.28%
WallTime filtered_owned_i64_avx512[OneNullInEight] 26.2 µs 22.8 µs +14.82%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing rk/wheelsdist (6912703) with develop (ed4733f)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 218 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@robert3005 robert3005 added the changelog/chore A trivial change label Sep 11, 2026
@robert3005
robert3005 requested a review from danking September 11, 2026 16:38

@danking danking left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems reasonable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/chore A trivial change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants