-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
docs: clarify child agents vs. named factory agents #728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Warp Factories is built on the [{VARS.WARP_AUTOMATION_PLATFORM}](/platform/overv | |
|
|
||
| The factory layer adds the workflow on top: the foreman and its agents, work items that carry each request across runs, definitions as code, default automations for connected tools, and the Scorer and Self-improvement loop. | ||
|
|
||
| A standalone [cloud agent](/platform/) remains the right tool for a single task or a one-trigger automation. Reach for a factory when the work is a standing, multi-stage process your team wants to route, measure, and improve in one place. | ||
| A standalone [cloud agent](/platform/) remains the right tool for a single task or a one-trigger automation, and any agent can spawn child agents with [multi-agent orchestration](/platform/orchestration/), no factory required. Reach for a factory when the work is a standing, multi-stage process your team wants to route, measure, and improve in one place, run by named agents that each keep their own instructions, model, harness, secrets, and MCP servers. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not sure if it is strictly needed here but do we document using the run_agents tool with a named agent anywhere at all? If not, that might be worthwhile to cover since there are some interesting details to note about what values we support for the run_agents tool and how we resolve them. |
||
|
|
||
| ## Key terms | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: this point about where to put agent-specific versus general skills feels kinda important but I found myself losing that key point while reading it. Maybe we can pull it out into distinct bullets?