feat(code-reviews): add manual jobs#4273
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Code Review SummaryStatus: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (7 files)
Previous Review Summaries (7 snapshots, latest commit 8960ed6)Current summary above is authoritative. Previous snapshots are kept for context only. Previous review (commit 8960ed6)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (3 files)
Previous review (commit 6713b63)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (2 files)
Previous review (commit c607251)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (1 file)
Previous review (commit 2d69d5c)Status: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (1 file)
Previous review (commit 5cbfe46)Status: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Files Reviewed (9 files)
Previous review (commit caeef16)Status: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Files Reviewed (5 files)
Previous review (commit 72fcba5)Status: 2 Issues Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Files Reviewed (31 files)
Reviewed by gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · Input: 95.3K · Output: 15.1K · Cached: 795.1K Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch |
alex-alecu
commented
Jun 26, 2026
…ode-reviews # Conflicts: # apps/web/src/components/code-reviews/CodeReviewStreamView.tsx
A stored v2 repository with an unknown type (e.g. legacy/E2E "empty-local" placeholders) or no repo/url identity fell through normalization unchanged and failed the discriminated union, throwing inside getMetadata(). That crashed every alarm/reaper cycle since cleanupIdleKiloServer reads metadata without needing the repository. Treat an unresolvable v2 repository as no repository instead of failing the whole metadata read; known-type repositories still validate strictly so genuine corruption is still surfaced. Self-heals on the next write.
eshurakov
approved these changes
Jun 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Manual Code Reviewer jobs can now be started from the Jobs card for personal users and organizations. In normal environments, jobs use the connected GitHub or GitLab account and post results back to the change. In local development, jobs can review public GitHub and GitLab changes without provider credentials and show the result in Kilo only.
Verification
Visual Changes
Screen.Recording.2026-06-30.at.10.33.48.mov
Reviewer Notes
Manual jobs store their model, effort, instructions, and output mode on the job so retries keep the same behavior. Local jobs are intentionally limited to explicit local development and public github.com or gitlab.com changes.