You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
finding(scripts): regenerate-known-schema-types.mjs cannot resolve a namespace passed by spread, so KNOWN_SCHEMA_TYPES omits five real runtime keys (ui:page / ui:app / ui:utility / ui:home / ui:record) — the blind spot three censuses on objectui#9263 shared #9641
① 实际业务需求 —— 拉动是实测的、而且已经兑现:五个键真的在运行时注册、真的有文档在用、校验器过去真的会拒收它们。⇒ 卡面价值已经拿到手。剩下争的不是能力,是注释的准确度,而它没有业务拉动方,只有下一个读这段代码的人。
② 项目长远合理性 —— 长远形态是「声明即强制」:注释里写的性质必须有仪器兜着(AGENTS 完善设计器的每一个细节 #9)。A 与 B 都达成它,区别只在用关闭缺口还是用申报缺口达成;C 不达成,它把一句已知为假的话留在代码里。⚠️ 这里有个结构性事实值得你知道:一个正则近似永远补不完,所以「把所有角落关掉」不是一个能到达的终点 —— 能到达的终点是「准确申报它看不见什么」。这正是 B 的形状,也是 A 做完之后必然停在的地方。
③ 防 AI 写元数据犯错 —— 这条最响。22 种静默读错里有幻影方向的(校验器放行一个运行时根本不存在的拼法 ⇒ 作者照着写、页面渲染不出东西、没有任何人报错)。⛔ 但今天活树一处都没踩上,而一句过强的注释本身就是防错轴的问题:它让下一个人以为别的写法会被拦住。⇒ 这条轴反对 C,对 A 与 B 都满意。
④ 创业阶段不扩散 —— 指向 B,并且对 A 有保留。已经四轮了,每轮关掉的角落今天零消费;继续投入是在为假想写法买保险。⚠️ 但 A 的增量是已被逐条点名的小活(两处措辞 + 几条 pin + 几行修复),不是开放式工程 —— 这是我仍然推荐 A 而不是 B 的唯一理由。
四棱同向? ⛔ 否 —— ①④ 偏 B(收手),②③ 要求「要么关掉、要么准确申报」,两者 A 与 B 都能满足。⇒ ⛔ 不满足代裁置信门,照常呈报。分歧只在 A 与 B 之间,且两者都可接受;C 被 ②③ 明确反对。
Filed by the domain:spec @ objectui execution seat (session session_01VCpmqvacV4BypY48QdoxcE), carrying a class (a) finding handed back by the dev on objectui#9263. ⭐ It is the root cause of that card's entire misdiagnosis: the derivation every census on that card trusted could not see the namespaced half of the very registration under review.
The defect
scripts/regenerate-known-schema-types.mjs cannot resolve a namespace that arrives through a spread. packages/components/src/renderers/layout/page.tsx registers five page kinds as:
pageMeta.namespace is 'ui', so packages/core/src/registry/Registry.ts stores two runtime keys per registration — ui:app and bare app. The generator resolves only the bare one.
⇒ The generated KNOWN_SCHEMA_TYPES omits five real runtime registry keys: ui:page, ui:app, ui:utility, ui:home, ui:record.
Measured, at the merge base — independent of objectui#9263's change
probe
reading
the five namespaced page keys in the generated list
0 each
the same five in the registry-parity roster (widget-dom-leak-sweep.test.tsx)
present as real runtime keys
firing control — three namespaced keys registered with a literal meta object (page:header, element:text, action:button)
1 each
absent-token control
0
⭐ The control is the part that makes this a defect rather than a design choice: the derivation is not blind to namespaces in general — only to namespaces that arrive by spread.
The consequence, in the generator's own words
This is the script's own named MISSING direction: objectui check reports a document spelling ui:page as an unknown type while it renders perfectly. A validator that refuses what the platform renders teaches authors to stop trusting the validator — the expensive direction, and the same one objectui#8499 recorded.
⚠️ Why this is worth more than its size suggests
On objectui#9263 three instruments agreed that removing the app registration was complete and safe: the card's original census, the dev's independent re-take, and this repository's own deriveRegistryKeys. All three probed only the bare spelling. ⇒ They agreed because they shared a blind spot, not because they were independent. Two of the three inherited it from this generator.
That card is now back with the maintainer with its premise falsified (see objectui#9263, comment 5700884796), and six shipped page documents in ObjectStack's own showcase were at stake.
What is NOT measured here
⛔ Whether any other registration in the tree passes its meta by spread and is therefore also half-invisible. The five page kinds are the ones this surfaced; a census across every ComponentRegistry.register call is owed before anyone claims these five are all of them.
⛔ The right repair. Resolving a spread statically, importing the meta, or deriving from the runtime registry are all different trades, and the generator's header may already rule some out.
维护者速读 —⚠️ 需要你的一个字母
事情是什么。 这张卡要修的缺陷已经修好并核实了:校验器过去看不懂「注册配置不是当场写开、而是用一个变量传进去」这种写法,于是漏掉五个真实存在的界面类型键(
ui:page/ui:app/ui:utility/ui:home/ui:record),作者写了它们、页面渲染得好好的,校验器却报「未知类型」。现在这五个键都在表上(649 个键,实测),而且一个键都没多、一个键都没少。那为什么还没落地。 因为这个校验器是用正则近似 JavaScript 的作用域与变量改动规则,它必然有看不见的角落。每一轮修复都把上一轮点名的角落关掉,然后在描述这次修复的注释里,又写下一句比代码实际做到的更强的话 —— 已经连续四轮是同一个形状。第三次达档复核实测了 46 种写法:21 种读对、12 种响亮拒收、22 种静默读错(其中 1 种是已申报的已知缺口)。⛔ 今天的代码库一处都没踩上,所以这不是「有 bug」,而是「注释把守卫说得比它实际更强」。
风险与代价(含回滚)。 现状风险接近于零:活树 0 findings、键集只多了那五个、冻结文件零改动。真正的代价是信任:一份声称「其它写法一律会报错」的注释,会让下一个人以为可以安心用别的写法。回滚是一次 revert。
席位意见。 剩下的活很小且已被逐条点名:两处把话说准、三到五条把已知缺口钉成测试(这样以后谁修好了它、测试会红),外加一处几行的真修复。我建议 A。但我先前已在卡上和对开发都公开说过「第三次 FAIL 就升级给你、不再自己派第四轮」,所以我停下来问,而不是自己续派 —— 规则是我立的,但改不改由你。
你要做的(一个动作)。 回一个字母:
os-decision-facets
Governing text:
AGENTS.md#9(注释断言的性质必须有仪器兜着)· SKILL.md 〈复核〉「最多 2 轮,第三次升级」· 防 AI 写元数据犯错轴 · 创业阶段不扩散轴。Filed by the
domain:spec@ objectui execution seat (sessionsession_01VCpmqvacV4BypY48QdoxcE), carrying a class (a) finding handed back by the dev on objectui#9263. ⭐ It is the root cause of that card's entire misdiagnosis: the derivation every census on that card trusted could not see the namespaced half of the very registration under review.The defect
scripts/regenerate-known-schema-types.mjscannot resolve anamespacethat arrives through a spread.packages/components/src/renderers/layout/page.tsxregisters five page kinds as:pageMeta.namespaceis'ui', sopackages/core/src/registry/Registry.tsstores two runtime keys per registration —ui:appand bareapp. The generator resolves only the bare one.⇒ The generated
KNOWN_SCHEMA_TYPESomits five real runtime registry keys:ui:page,ui:app,ui:utility,ui:home,ui:record.Measured, at the merge base — independent of objectui#9263's change
widget-dom-leak-sweep.test.tsx)page:header,element:text,action:button)⭐ The control is the part that makes this a defect rather than a design choice: the derivation is not blind to namespaces in general — only to namespaces that arrive by spread.
The consequence, in the generator's own words
This is the script's own named MISSING direction:
objectui checkreports a document spellingui:pageas an unknown type while it renders perfectly. A validator that refuses what the platform renders teaches authors to stop trusting the validator — the expensive direction, and the same one objectui#8499 recorded.On objectui#9263 three instruments agreed that removing the
appregistration was complete and safe: the card's original census, the dev's independent re-take, and this repository's ownderiveRegistryKeys. All three probed only the bare spelling. ⇒ They agreed because they shared a blind spot, not because they were independent. Two of the three inherited it from this generator.That card is now back with the maintainer with its premise falsified (see objectui#9263, comment
5700884796), and six shipped page documents in ObjectStack's own showcase were at stake.What is NOT measured here
ComponentRegistry.registercall is owed before anyone claims these five are all of them.pm:queue, unassigned.session_号,账号hotlong只是会话被发到的 TOKEN,⛔ 不是作者。本班收尾那次check-half-states扫描点了本卡(同批还点了 #9641 / #9642),故由填卡席本人原地补入该号,补写于 2026-09-17T06:25Z;⛔ 正文其余部分一字未改,编辑历史 GitHub 自留。Generated by Claude Code